Apple’s mysterious $658 million “technicality”

After a few years of accounting practice, and many years of researching earnings manipulation, I’ve learned a few basic rules, rules so fundamental that even a superstar like Apple can’t defy them. Here are two:

Rule 1: There is no such thing as an “accounting technicality”

Occasionally, in conference calls, CFO’s and CEO’s speak of “accounting technicalities.” I know US GAAP pretty well, and it never defines anything called a “technicality.” So what’s a technicality? Let’s just say that it’s a conspiratorial accounting rule that (1) lowers income, (2) confuses investors into thinking the company’s performance is worse than it really is, and (3) is too confusing and obscure for you to understand.

Take Apple. Gary Morton of Seeking Alpha wrote a thoughtful post evaluating Apple’s technicality, an unusually large 4th quarter “anomaly” that was caused by an accounting technicality in the OI&P line. Morton evaluates Apple’s quarterly numbers and discovers that, if it weren’t for that minor technical anomaly, Apple’s results would have beat expectations by $0.17.

GAAP isn’t so arbitrary that it just throws anomalies and technicalities around to hurt companies’ quarterly earnings reports. In fact, there was a loss, and Apple had to record it. Here are my first two questions:

1. Why is Apple engaging in ineffective cash flow hedges?

2. Why did Apple lose $658 million on these transactions?

Rule 2: Understating income this year causes you to overstate net income sometime in the future

Financial accounting is a lot like a shell game. You can move the ball around under the cups as much as you want, but try as you might, you can’t make that darned ball go away. This means that a company (like, say, Enron) can sometimes get away with hiding losses for awhile. But those losses don’t go away. Instead, they hang around on the balance sheet, waiting to get recorded.

This shell game can go in the other direction, too. If a company chooses to (or is forced to) record an expense early, then it won’t need to record the expense later. This reduces income now but raises it later.

Back to Apple again. Apple’s $683 million technicality loss hurt earnings in the Fourth Quarter. But this is $683 million worth of losses that Apple won’t have to record next year, thereby giving its earnings a greater boost next year. My final question:

How will Apple’s $683 million technicality boost earnings next year?

Companies sometimes engage in this kind of shenanigans when times are good, but not expected to stay good forever. Recording losses early (so-called cookie-jar reserves) allow companies to tuck profit away from the good years, so that they’ll have it when they need it during the bad years. I’m not alleging that Apple is trying to do this, and I’m skeptical that Apple is worrying about future earnings. Nonetheless, remember that today’s loss is tomorrow’s gain…


About Mark P. Holtzman

Chair of Accounting Department at Seton Hall University. PhD from The University of Texas at Austin. Worked at Deloitte's New York Office. BSBA from Hofstra University.


  1. This is very interesting Mark. If I understand correctly, Apple (strategically) would play this shell game in this quarter (a weaker quarter historically but not their worst) to make the next quarter the better (their best quarter historically). Oct to Dec – holiday season – has been Apple’s best quarter year-after-year since the early ’00 with the iPod. In addition, with two blockbuster products to drive revenue (iPhone 5 and iPad Mini), the numbers should be impressive even for Apple’s standards for their Oct to Dec quarter.

    That said, the rumors are all over the place talking about supply chain problems (including 1,600 iPad Minis stolen from JFK – right out of Goodfellas). The iPad mini is in very short supply, the iPhone 5 is in very short supply, and even their new iMac many not even make it to market or will be in extremely limited quantity. Perhaps this “technicality” is an accounting hedge in case the numbers are low do to supply issues. Apple cannot mess up this quarter or the analysts will go berserk – they’ll lose 50 to 100 points. Apple has already missed Wall Street’s projections in the last two earnings calls.

    • It fits. This is a way to “hedge” earnings in case a future quarter is weak. Using different accounting rules, Microsoft used to do the same thing back in the 90’s when it was hot $#\£.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: